The Danish politicians wish to stroll in the strides of the tyrannical governments in the Islamic world

proposition to ban Hizb ut Tahrir – An indication of ideological insolvency

On the 25th of February 2015, few media reported that a wide lion's share in the Danish parliament underpins the administration's proposition to ban Hizb ut Tahrir. Along these lines, they have by and by requested that the Attorney General investigate the likelihood of a ban.

This is not the first occasion this boycott is proposed in Denmark. In 2008, the Attorney General arrived at the common conclusion that there is no lawful premise for banning Hizb ut Tahrir, since it is universally realized that Hizb ut Tahrir is an ideological political party. Our work is political, and we call to specific musings. Demonstrations of savagery have truly no spot in our method, in light of the fact that Hizb ut Tahrir is bound by the work-method of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.

At the point when MPs still discuss a ban, and even proclaim that they wish, the Attorney General could legitimately approve it, this says a considerable measure in regards to the waning level of trust in their own standards and qualities, on the off chance that they have any such. The Justice Minister, Mette Frederiksen (S), said, “My own view is that this organisation should be dissolved”, whereby she not just communicated that Muslims can be liable with no proof, however that Muslims can be blameworthy notwithstanding when the inverse is really demonstrated.

The Danish legislators wish to stroll in the strides of the tyrannical administrations in the Islamic world, whom they have bolstered for a considerable length of time, trying to utilize pressure and bans against contemplations and political restriction, which they can't counter with contentions in a helpful verbal confrontation.

By and by, these government officials propose to ban Hizb ut Tahrir for calling to the Islamic qualities and political solutions in words and thought, while they talk about freedom of expression in the meantime. On the off chance that it had not as of now get to be clear to everybody, the boundless false reverence would be worth calling attention to. Hizb ut Tahrir has since a long time ago contended that freedom of expression is a dream and a political instrument used to belittle the individuals who think in an unexpected way. The lawmakers have now again affirmed this with their own behavior.

In the wake of planting the seeds of disdain and friction for a considerable length of time from the parliament platform and with their domestic and foreign policy, these career-government officials now endeavor to score shabby voter-focuses by playing on the digressions of trepidation and mass agitation. This most recent wish for a ban has nothing to do with national security, yet presumably a considerable amount to do with career-ambitions in connection to the coming elections.

The Danish legislators, with the Justice Minister in front, disregarded, in their neglectful franticness, the way that no ban or compulsion can prevent thoughts from spreading. Hizb ut Tahrir's position is firm. The support for the Party's thoughts is developing in all the nations where we work – with or without a ban. The Islamic party have absolute trust in truth of the thoughts and qualities that they convey, and they will keep calling to them at all times.

قُلْ هَـذِهِ سَبِيلِي أَدْعُو إِلَى اللّهِ عَلَى بَصِيرَةٍ أَنَاْ وَمَنِ اتَّبَعَنِي وَسُبْحَانَ اللّه وَمَا أَنَاْ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ

Say: ‘This is my way. I call to Allah with inner sight, I and all who follow me. Glory be to Allah! I am not one of the idolaters!’

(Qur'an Surat Yusuf, 12:108)

release of Al Raya daily paper Jordan Middle East

 

Welcoming Al Raya Daily Paper …  a Memory and Good News

Commendation be to Allah and peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allah and upon His family and associates and the individuals who tail Him… 

Hizb ut Tahrir issued the first release of Al Raya daily paper on the twenty-eighth of Thul Qidah 1373 AH comparing to 28/07/1954 CE, the last issue, number 13, was issued on Wednesday 29 Safar 1374 AH relating to 27/10/1954 CE, as indicated by what we saw from the remaining Al Raya issues we have gotten. Along these lines the quantity of issues distributed are thirteen in number, a portion of the brothers were cited to say that the quantities of issues distributed were fourteen, it appears that there was an issue under planning for issuance when the Jordanian administration's choice came to close down the daily paper starting 28/10/1954 CE. It appears that the issue has been distributed after the decision, consequently there were fourteen issues in number, in spite of the fact that we have not yet seen this issue to be sure, but rather we will continue distribution of Al Raya daily paper from the fifteenth issue, to be safe, for the thought specified previously.

The al Raya daily paper was distributed in Amman from a little office close Al-Husseini Mosque, on Wednesday of every week, it was a week by week daily paper. The manager of Al Raya Newspaper was the prominent researcher Sheik Abdul Qadeem Zaloom, may Allah's leniency be upon him, who later turned into the second Ameer of the Islamic political party, the proofreader's secretary was Munir Shiqayr, and one of the editors as we learned was Brother Nabih Al Jaza'iri, whose center was the interpretation of critical matters of significance reported in daily papers and magazines distributed in English.

The al Raya daily paper was different from other daily papers, it didn't contain ads or representations or brightened pieces, however was announcing the haqq and proclaiming truth. The al Raya daily paper talked about the political circumstance and tended to it from the viewpoint of Islam; its four pages were sold for a penny and a half in those days, it was a pot flooding with its substance, loaded with what might advantage the people, it was utilized totally for the point of interest of the good and battling insidious, dreading nobody yet Allah.

The daily paper's weapon was the expression of truth, then again, it was overwhelming upon the oppressors, heavier than shells and rockets…  Therefore the party, particularly its al Raya daily paper, when the regime restricted the law of lecturing and guidance which was proposed to keep the party's individuals and all the faithful from giving lessons in mosques, this law was issued by the Interior Minister on the requests of Glubb the Jordanian armed force officer at the time, when the party tested the law, the Jordan administration couldn't endure the effect of the expression of truth subsequently it dispatched capture campaigns against the party individuals, furthermore battled the daily paper and sought after its essayists, even the distributed issues of the daily paper did not get away from their arraignment, they were considered as criminal confirmation against those found to have them!…  This is the way the daily paper was banned from production after the thirteenth's version on Wednesday, 29 Safar 1374 AH, comparing to 27/10/1954 CE as specified previously.

After that the party attempted to distribute the al Raya daily paper in Lebanon however was not able to do as such, so it employed the weekend version of one of the Lebanese-possessed daily papers of George Sa'adah. The party started writing in it under the name of "Al Hadara" and the length of time of the lease contract was six months, after the end of span the gathering asked for to replenish the agreement yet the proprietor won't, saying that the sum he got for the lease was not sufficient to pay for his taxi treks between the diverse Lebanese security administrations office and his home, on account of the complaints of the security offices to what was distributed in the daily paper! This was when Lebanon bragged of its freedom of expression and was brimming with daily papers from each course, however the administration was pestered with this week after week version, and they constrained the daily paper's proprietor to cross out the lease, and that is the thing that occurred after the six months… 

At that point in the late fifties of the most recent century and the resulting years, the party endured abusive campaigns loaded with scorn and perniciousness against the party and its individuals. Subsequently the gathering relinquished its endeavors to distribute the daily paper and exploited its capacities accessible in other direct party work, particularly since the method for correspondence (online networking) were not accessible then as it is today, where it is conceivable to issue any daily paper through these methods without security inconvenience similar to the case beforehand. Thus the party proceeded with its typical Hizbi work of building the body of the party, making public opinion, and looking for the Nusra. In the nineties and past it included the media offices, then the show and broadcast television and the distinctive media locales profiting from cutting edge Internet advances that have helped in the foundation of web and broadcast, and the diverse destinations.

Concerning the resumption of the al Raya daily paper the party wanted to begin issuing it with the real declaration of the Khilafah, particularly that in the Hizb's recognition it was practically settled more than once, yet as Allah سبحانه وتعالى says:

لِكُلِّ أَجَلٍ كِتَابٌ

“For every term is a decree”

(Qur'an Surat Ar-Ra’d: 38)

Despite the fact that the party was not fruitful in really making the Khilafah, but rather by the beauty of Allah it has succeeded in discovering a vigorous general sentiment for it, and it has turned into the interest of the Muslims, every one of them or the lion's share of them, and it appeared to be as though the Khilafah is built on a fundamental level. The Islamic Ideological Party chose to resume the issuance of the al Raya daily paper asking Allah سبحانه وتعالى that the distribution of the daily paper will be a sweet memory to the introductory production and happy news that conveys euphoria to the breasts of the fast approaching foundation of the Khilafah after it appears as though it is established in principle.

Taking everything into account, we have applied push to discover a few issues of the daily paper that survived the regimes' captures at the time i.e. prior to sixty years back, to pass on to the perusers some of what came in the issues that survived the foul play of such regimes. We discovered a couple of issues, including those which can be perused with trouble, and those tore separated from one another. One of the brothers who was keen on the procurement of those issues said that he kept duplicates of the daily paper, and as a consequence of mistreatment and provocation, which was completed by the regime against individuals from Hizb ut-Tahrir, he was compelled to conceal them in a rush in a place that didn't have the necessary protection for them, which created harm to the duplicates of the daily paper after those long years. Four news pieces of this al Raya daily paper some of what we can read from those previously stated issues:

1. On the first page of the eighth release of Wednesday, 24 Muharram 1374 AH relating to 23/09/1954 CE it highlighted an article under this title: “The most terrible crime that will be perpetrated by the Arab politicians … peace with “Israel” a heavy blow to the Islamic Ummah … the Ummah considers any settlement reached in the issue of Palestine as a major betrayal …”

The subtle elements of this news piece are long we may distribute them in the forthcoming issues, InshaAllah.

2. In the same issue, an article in the second page was highlighted under this title: “Egypt and military aid: WASHINGTON- the Egyptian military mission headed by Major General Mohamed Ibrahim, Chief of Staff of the Egyptian army, visited US Army Secretary Mr. Stevens and talks were held on the subject of American military aid to Egypt which held preliminary talks with the US ambassador Mr. Jefferson Caffery in Cairo and Egyptian officials.”

3. On the first page of the twelfth version issued on Wednesday 22 Safar 1374 AH, comparing to 20/10/1954 CE, it expressed the accompanying: “So that people do not know: they are trying to conceal the crime … Selwyn Lloyd asked to work for peace secretly.
 

LONDON- news agencies- Selwyn Lloyd the head of the British delegation at the United Nations stated in response to a question on the issue of Palestine in the press conference by saying:

There will be no progress in relations between Jews and Arabs, only if the two teams agreed on steps to be taken in this way.

He said that one of the difficulties in the way of an agreement is that the dissemination of information to the public means that everyone passing this way or that rejects the proposal.

I believe that it is far better to try to work more secretly to see perhaps it is possible to find a way to reconcile these differences.”

4. On the fourth page of the twelfth version issued on Wednesday, 22 Safar 1374 AH, comparing to 20/10/1954 CE an article under this title was published:
“In a new diplomatic maneuver … Russia conducted a military agreement with Communist China … in response to the southeast Asia Pact… designed to isolate America from the Far East.” 

the advice of the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم to Abu Zhar (ra), he said:

«أَوْصَانِي خَلِيلِي صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ بِخِصَالٍ مِنَ الْخَيْرِ… وَأَوْصَانِي أَنْ لَا أَخَافَ فِي اللَّهِ لَوْمَةَ لَائِمٍ وَأَوْصَانِي أَنْ أَقُولَ الْحَقَّ وَإِنْ كَانَ مُرًّا وَأَوْصَانِي أَنْ أُكْثِرَ مِنْ قَوْلِ لَا حَوْلَ وَلَا قُوَّةَ إِلَّا بِاللَّهِ فَإِنَّهَا كنز من كنوز الجنة»

“Allah’s Khalil (friend) صلى الله عليه وسلم advised me with good qualities … and advised me that I must not fear anyone but Allah, he advised me to speak the truth though it is bitter and he advised me to increase uttering: (la hawl wa la quwata ila billah) that there is no power but from Allah, for it is one of the treasures of Paradise.”

[Narrated by Ibn Haban in his Saheeh, and Imam Ahmad in his Musnad, and Ibn Abi Shaybah in his Musanaf… Narration of the texts are by Ibn Haban.]

Extraordinary International Ladies Conference Women and Sharia Separating Fact from Fiction

Hizb ut Tahrir's official daily paper: The resumption of Al Raya daily paper's production

Triumph to the Banner of Massenger of Allah

Hizb ut Tahrir Turkey held a Khilafah meeting 2015

ideological battle and political confrontation are integral to the Prophetic methodology of change

ideological battle and political confrontation are integral to the Prophetic methodology of change

why doesn't Hizb ut Tahrir assemble institutions or participate in Jihad to re-establish Khilafah?

Numerous Muslim ideologues and activists have criticized Hizb ut Tahrir for its receiving of a politico-learned methodology of progress in contradistinction to movements which have embraced a more institutional methodology and/or insurrectionist armed methods. What they neglect to comprehend is:

(1) the nature of the Prophet method

(2) the nature of tughyan i.e. [political] oppression and

(3) the power-mechanisms of the hegemonic world-system. To better comprehend the Party's methodology, it is critical to comprehend that it is taking into account an Islamic anti-systemic to systemic and decolonial methodology, as we will clarify underneath:

The Nature of the Prophetic Methodology
The Prophetic methodology is in light of the development of a critical cognizance which kills every transient entitie (be it men, frameworks, thoughts, and so on.) from dishonestly obtained properties of Absoluteness. It is, as it were, taking into account the first maxim of La ilaha ila Allah: the discriminating methodology of invalidation. It goes without saying, that these Absolute properties are not characteristic for worldly substances but instead they are erroneously obtained through a false cognizance and sedimented practices (the religion of the progenitors, establishments i.e. the systemization of social relations and thoughts, et cetera). To put it plainly, idol-construction is a learned procedure and in this way idol-deconstruction obliges a counter-intelligent methodology. Shots can't deconstruct a "thought" – no one but thoughts can subvert different thoughts.

The Nature of Tughyan
Compulsion and material subordination, if not supplemented with a false awareness which traits god-like credits to the coercer, is not tugyan yet rather one type of mistreatment. Implying that, if the abused perceive that the oppressor is in reality an illegitimate oppressor – that oppressor is not a taghout/false-god. Besides, from a Qur'anic viewpoint, the birthplaces of tughyan and its corresponding manifestations of material and/or ideological subordination is not the result of the taghi's material capacities yet rather it is a result of the taghi's transgression of the Islamic tareeqah, all the more particularly, the points of confinement of rulership in Islam. It starts with epistemic hubris i.e. the taghi's case to be a definitive referent of learning, legitimacy as well as power. It is, by and by, an intellectual process. Power has various structures, the most deceptive of which is epistemic-oppression:

The Nature of the Capitalist World-System
The colonial hegemon – the United States – can't depend singularly on its military and economic systems of power. These manifestations of "hard power" are just disciplinary instruments which are utilized when the colonized inquiry the colonizers "sanity" and the predominant neo-liberal and Westphalian rationale (that of the nation-state). The crucial wellspring of the colonizers power is: character development i.e. consciousness development – a methodology through which the colonized's political skylines are constrained by the predominant philosophy and through which we build our personality entirely in connection to the colonial center (this has often been alluded to as Coloniality instead of just Colonization). How is this type of subordination and expert/slave lingo protected? Bertrand Badie, in his fundamental content 'The Imported State: the Westernization of the World Order' clarifies that colonization is a two-way process: it is both sent out (by the colonial center) and imported by the colonized elites. To put it plainly, our subordination is inseparably connected to the "ideological state apparatus" – i.e. the modernizing secular nation-state. Likewise, we must participate in an ideological battle (as-sira' al-fikri) against the ideology of the "ideological state apparatus" and a political battle (al-kifah as-siyassi) against the importing apparatus. Both ideological battle (as-sira' al-fikri) and political confrontation (al-kifah as-siyassi) are integral to the methodology of Hizb ut Tahrir.

Methodologies which diminish "activity" like those of armed insurgences and institution-building are insufficient in that they don't perceive the need of intellectual liberation and associative institutional change (instead of institutional-building – and consequently not hostile to false system) and institutional change must be gone before by a defeating of the hegemonic arguments which legitimize the Jahili institutions. Moreover, the Party does not derive its methodology from the episteme of the colonizer (similar to the case with reformist "Islamist") nor has it added to its methodology in response to the materiality of the colonizer (just like the case with the Salafi Jihadi method) – yet rather, it draws on an option episteme: revelation. It is hence, that the founder of Hizb ut Tahrir, Imam Taqi ad Din a Nabhani suitably named the Party: the Liberation Party.