proposition to ban Hizb ut Tahrir – An indication of ideological insolvency
On the 25th of February 2015, few media reported that a wide lion's share in the Danish parliament underpins the administration's proposition to ban Hizb ut Tahrir. Along these lines, they have by and by requested that the Attorney General investigate the likelihood of a ban.
This is not the first occasion this boycott is proposed in Denmark. In 2008, the Attorney General arrived at the common conclusion that there is no lawful premise for banning Hizb ut Tahrir, since it is universally realized that Hizb ut Tahrir is an ideological political party. Our work is political, and we call to specific musings. Demonstrations of savagery have truly no spot in our method, in light of the fact that Hizb ut Tahrir is bound by the work-method of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ.
At the point when MPs still discuss a ban, and even proclaim that they wish, the Attorney General could legitimately approve it, this says a considerable measure in regards to the waning level of trust in their own standards and qualities, on the off chance that they have any such. The Justice Minister, Mette Frederiksen (S), said, “My own view is that this organisation should be dissolved”, whereby she not just communicated that Muslims can be liable with no proof, however that Muslims can be blameworthy notwithstanding when the inverse is really demonstrated.
The Danish legislators wish to stroll in the strides of the tyrannical administrations in the Islamic world, whom they have bolstered for a considerable length of time, trying to utilize pressure and bans against contemplations and political restriction, which they can't counter with contentions in a helpful verbal confrontation.
By and by, these government officials propose to ban Hizb ut Tahrir for calling to the Islamic qualities and political solutions in words and thought, while they talk about freedom of expression in the meantime. On the off chance that it had not as of now get to be clear to everybody, the boundless false reverence would be worth calling attention to. Hizb ut Tahrir has since a long time ago contended that freedom of expression is a dream and a political instrument used to belittle the individuals who think in an unexpected way. The lawmakers have now again affirmed this with their own behavior.
In the wake of planting the seeds of disdain and friction for a considerable length of time from the parliament platform and with their domestic and foreign policy, these career-government officials now endeavor to score shabby voter-focuses by playing on the digressions of trepidation and mass agitation. This most recent wish for a ban has nothing to do with national security, yet presumably a considerable amount to do with career-ambitions in connection to the coming elections.
The Danish legislators, with the Justice Minister in front, disregarded, in their neglectful franticness, the way that no ban or compulsion can prevent thoughts from spreading. Hizb ut Tahrir's position is firm. The support for the Party's thoughts is developing in all the nations where we work – with or without a ban. The Islamic party have absolute trust in truth of the thoughts and qualities that they convey, and they will keep calling to them at all times.
قُلْ
هَـذِهِ سَبِيلِي أَدْعُو إِلَى اللّهِ عَلَى بَصِيرَةٍ أَنَاْ وَمَنِ
اتَّبَعَنِي وَسُبْحَانَ اللّه وَمَا أَنَاْ مِنَ الْمُشْرِكِينَ
Say: ‘This is my way. I call
to Allah with inner sight, I and all who follow me. Glory be to Allah! I
am not one of the idolaters!’
(Qur'an Surat Yusuf, 12:108)